<%@ Language=VBScript %> IVC - Featured Article <% Set Con=Server.CreateObject("Adodb.Connection") Con.Open("DSN=scroll connect") mySQL = "SELECT * FROM scroll" Set RS=Con.Execute(mySQL) %>

"> Your browser can't run Java!


SEROLOGICAL STUDIES ON A HUMAN COHORT FROM AN AREA OF SOUTH INDIA ENDEMIC FOR JAPANESE ENCEPHALITIS VIRUS
Priti Kumar and Vijaya Satchidanandam

Courtesy : Festschrift - Dr. S. Ramachandran


Introduction
Japanese encephalitis (JE), a mosquito-borne flaviviral infection has now been recognized as the principal cause of childhood encephalitis in Asia with approximately, 35,000 cases and 10,000 deaths being reported annually (1). The virus was first isolated from a post-mortem human brain in Japan in 1933 although descriptive accounts of the disease date back to 1871 (2). At present this disease is a serious public health problem in many countries of Asia including Burma, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Nepal, Thailand, and Vietnam. The family Flaviviridae, of which JEV is a member, contains more than 70 viruses including the clinically important yellow fever (YF), dengue, West Nile (WNV), St. Louis encephalitis (SLE), and tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) viruses (3).

The presence of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) in India was first inferred through a serological study in 1951, which demonstrated the presence of neutralizing antibodies to the virus in humans (4) but the disease was only recognized in 1956 with JEV being isolated from mosquitoes and human brain specimens in 1958 in Vellore (5).

Although a history of clinical exposure and certain clinical features may suggest JE, laboratory confirmation, usually by serological tests is absolutely essential. JE virus occasionally can be recovered from blood but only in the pre-neuroinvasive phase (up to 3 to 7 days after onset) but no peripheral viremia is detected in the encephalitic phase. Virus can be recovered from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of encephalitic patients (6). Viral detection methods involve inoculation of the test samples into cells in culture and scoring for cytopathic effects or for viral antigen by immunofluorescence (IF) using antibodies to the E protein. The most easy and widely used diagnostic method is the IgM-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MAC-ELISA) first introduced in 1982 (7). A modification of the original MAC-ELISA incorporating a color reaction is the most popular and currently used format (8, 9). Specific IgM can be detected in CSF, serum or both in approximately 75% of patients within the first 4 days after onset of illness, and nearly all patients are positive 7 days after onset (10). Both fluids are tested to maximize sensitivity. In approximately 30% of the cases, antigen-bearing infected cells can be identified in CSF by IF antibody before intrathecal IgM is detected, yielding a specific diagnosis within hours of a lumbar puncture. However, the procedure’s sensitivity (58%) was lower than that of MAC-ELISA testing of acute CSF and serum samples (84%).

Materials and methods
Cells and virus: The P20778 strain of JEV (Genbank Accession number AF080251; 11) was propagated in the Aedes albopictus cell line C6/36 [National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India] at 28oC in MEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco BRL, Grand Island, New York). Briefly, C6/36 monolayers were infected with JEV at a multiplicity of infection (moi) of 1 pfu/cell and incubated in Eagles Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) (Gibco BRL) containing 5% fetal bovine serum, 0.3% tryptose phosphate broth (DIFCO Laboratories, Detroit, Michigan), 0.22% NaHCO3 and 2 mM HEPES for 5 d. The supernatants were collected and stored at -800C until use. The viral titres were approximately 1 x 108 pfu/ml in plaque assays on PS (Porcine kidney) cells. PS and Vero cells (NCCS, Pune, India) were maintained in MEM/10% FBS at 370C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.

Human subjects: The human volunteers chosen for the study consisted of 11 healthy contacts (HC) and 16 convalescent JE-patients (CP) from a JE-endemic area of South India.

Cloning, expression and purification of the E gene of JEV 

The E gene of JEV (nucleotides 978 to 2478 of the JEV genome) was obtained by PCR of the recombinant plasmid PM7 (a kind gift of Dr. Peter Mason; 12) using the following primer pairs:

  1. 5’-GCGCGCCGAATTCTCGAG ATG TTT AAT TGT CTG GCA ATG GGC - 3’ (sense primer, nucleotides 978 to 998 of the JEV genome)
  2. 5’ -GCGCGC TTA TGC ATG CAC ATT GGT CGC TAA - 3’ (antisense primer, nucleotides 2457 to 2478 of the JEV genome)


The 1.5 kb PCR product was digested with EcoRI and ligated as a EcoRI- blunt fragment to the eukaryotic expression vector, pTMI (a kind gift of Dr. Bernard Moss, National Institutes of Health, USA) cut with EcoRI and StuI to give pTMI-E. The E gene was then excised from pTM1-E by digestion with SalI, Klenow filling followed by a partial digestion with NcoI and subcloned into the pET-3d vector in- between the NcoI and Klenow-filled BamHI sites to give pET3d-E. The protein expressed in E.coli BL21(DE3) host cells on IPTG induction was purified by electroelution.

Radioimmunoprecipitation and western blot analysis for detecting serum antibodies: Antibodies that recognize the native E protein of JEV were detected by RIP as described (13). Briefly, PS cells infected with the P20778 strain of JEV were metabolically labeled with [35S]-methionine (EXPRE35S35S, NEN Life Science Products Inc., Boston, MA, 1175.0 Ci/mmol) 24 h post infection, harvested by scraping 8 h later and washed twice with PBS. The cells were lysed by sonication in the presence of protease inhibitors in RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4; containing 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% DOC and 1% triton X-100), clarified by centrifugation and preadsorbed to protein A-sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Asia Pacific Ltd., Buckinghamshire, England) coated with a pool of serum samples from 18 donors ascertained to be negative for antibodies to JEV. The lysate was then incubated with the test serum sample bound to protein A-sepharose beads overnight at 4oC in RIPA buffer (13) with constant mixing. The beads were washed, boiled in SDS-sample buffer and electrophoresed on a SDS-PAGE and the gel bearing the immunoprecipitated proteins was dried and exposed to an X-ray film. 

To study the potential of the test serum samples in reacting with the denatured E protein, purified inclusion body preparations from E.coli expressing recombinant E were electrophoresed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and blotted on to a nitrocellulose (NC) membrane. The NC-membrane was subsequently cut into strips and each strip, incubated with the test serum at a 1:100 dilution in blocking buffer (0.5% gelatin in 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and 0.05% Tween-20). Colour was developed using protein-A-HRP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Asia Pacific Ltd., Buckinghamshire, England) and diaminobenzidine as substrate.

Antibodies to the NS1 protein of JEV in the serum samples of donors were detected by RIP as described (13) with an additional western blot included to confirm the identity of the NS1 protein. The RIP samples boiled in SDS-sample buffer were electrophoresed on a SDS-PAGE as described above. Proteins were blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane, which was incubated with the rabbit antiserum raised to recombinant NS1 protein at a dilution of 1:1500. Blots were developed using HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Bangalore Genei Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India) and diaminobenzidine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The same blot was then exposed to an X-ray film to visualize all the proteins of JEV immuno-precipitated by the serum samples. The relative intensities of the immunoprecipitated viral protein bands were quantitated in arbitrary units using a Bioimage Analyzer (Fuji, Tokyo, Japan).

The glycosylation status of the NS1 protein was studied by inhibiting this process by treating JEV-infected cells with tunicamycin. PS cells were infected with JE virus at a moi of 5.0. 10 hours post infection the monolayer was washed and overlayed with fresh warm RPMI medium containing tunicamycin at a final concentration of 5ěg/ml. After incubation for 1 h at 37oC the cells were pulsed with 200 ěCI of 35S-methionine and incubation continued for the next 12 hours. The cells were harvested and RIP was performed as above.

Results

Serum samples from JE-exposed individuals predominantly recognize the native conformation of the E protein of JEV

Of the 22 representative samples shown in Figure 1, 6 (lanes 2, 3, 11, 14,15 and 17) were obtained from the control group and the remaining were obtained from acute phase encephalitis patients. In order to determine whether the conformation of the E protein had any bearing on its recognition by E-specific antibodies, the reactivity of serum samples from JE-exposed individuals to denatured (Fig.1a) and the native (Fig.1a) forms of the E protein was compared.

Figure 1


Serum samples from patients with JE-encephalitis predominantly recognize the native form of the viral envelope protein. A. Western blot analysis of individual serum samples for reactivity to recombinant envelope protein expressed in E.coli. Each lane represents a different serum sample. B. Radioimmunoprecipitation of metabolically labeled JE-infected PS cell lysates using the same serum samples shown in A. Lane M used mouse anti-JE serum as positive control. 

Three of the six control samples were found to have absolutely no reactivity to the E protein. Of the 16 patient samples, 10 had stronger reactivity to the native form of the E protein (Fig.1b). In fact, 7 of these 10 sera could not even weakly detect the denatured protein (Fig.1a, lanes 1, 5, 6, 10, 20, 21 and 22). Of the remaining 6 samples, 3 had good reactivities to both forms of E (Fig.1a, lanes 4, 7 and 16). Only three sera had stronger reactivities to the denatured protein (lanes 12, 18 and 19), but could weakly immunoprecipitate the native form, and the bands were visible only after a prolonged exposure of the gel to an X-ray film. Serum reactivities to denatured E protein were not dependent on the glycosylation status since western blots of JE-infected C6/36 cell lysates probed with the same serum samples did not improve the signal strength (data not shown).

Figure 2

 

Reactivity of serum samples from JE-exposed individuals to the NS1 protein. A. Radioimmunoprecipitation of 35S-methionine labeled PS cell lysates with sera from JE-exposed individuals. Data with representative serum samples from acute (PA) and convalescent phase (PC) JE patients, as well as healthy contacts (HC), is shown. Lane labeled M used mouse anti-JE serum as positive control.

Fig. 2A shows the reactivity of sera from four healthy contacts, four acute phase JE patients and eight convalescent JE patients to the NS1 protein of JEV detected by radioimmunoprecipitation. While all convalescent patients scored positive, sera from healthy contacts had at best very weak reactivity to this viral protein. Acute phase patient sera had weak reactivity to NS1 barely detectable except on long exposure of the autoradiogram although all four samples had reactivity to the envelope protein. The identity of the lower band detected by RIP was confirmed to be NS1 by western blotting the radioimmunoprecipitated material with NS1-specific rabbit antiserum (Figure 2B). We have encountered a few acute phase samples with reactivity to NS1; however, their small proportion rules out the feasibility of using NS1-specific antibodies as a diagnostic tool. Synthesis of viral proteins in individuals suffering from the disease would be expected to be at a much higher level than that obtaining in infected healthy contacts who successfully ward off disease, perhaps explaining the significant levels of anti-NS1 serum titers in patients compared to healthy exposed individuals. The basis for late onset of these antibodies could be of some interest.

The ability of two patient sera tested (P1 and P2) to react with NS1 was independent of its glycosylation status. When we inhibited glycosylation by treating JE-infected cells with tunicamycin, we found that the patient sera immuno- precipitated both glycosylated and non-glycosylated forms of the NS1 protein, only from JE-infected but not control cell lysates (Fig. 3).

Figure 3 



JE patient sera recognize the NS1 protein independent of its glycosylation status. JE-infected PS cells were treated with tunicamycin to inhibit glycosylation and metabolically labeled lysates were immunoprecipitated using two serum samples that recognized the NS1 protein, as described in the Methods section. 
The left panel in Fig. 4 is a schematic representation of the 5 steps involved in the MAC-ELISA (8, 9), the currently used diagnostic test for the detection of IgM antibodies in the CSF of JE-patients. If the antigen used in the MAC-ELISA can be substituted with an easily-available purified recombinant E protein, it can replace the antigen in step #3 in addition to greatly reducing the number of steps involved (Fig. 4, right panel). Our results would suggest that a combination of denatured and native envelope protein preparations would give the best results in JE diagnostic ELISA.

Discussion
Serum antibodies directed to the envelope glycoprotein of JEV have for long been used to detect exposure to the virus. However, presence of these antibodies in CSF occurs only during the acute phase of encephalitis and has been used to Figure 4 

 



Schematic representation of the MAC-ELISA (A) currently used in JE-diagnosis compared to the proposed format (B) using recombinant envelope protein. differentially diagnose encephalitis due to JE from other etiologies. We explored the possibility of using serum in the place of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in diagnosis of encephalitis due to JE. Our results clearly showed that serum of acute phase encephalitis patients could replace CSF in JE diagnosis, thus helping to avoid the invasive lumbar puncture procedure. Although a sizeable number of convalescent JE patients also did have NS1-reactive serum antibodies, their absence in acute phase sera precluded the use of NS1 as a diagnostic antigen.

The MAC-ELISA (Fig. 4A, left panel) which is the diagnostic test currently used for the detection of JE-specific antibodies in the CSF of suspected JE-patients (8, 9) suffers from several demerits. Besides being extremely time-consuming and cumbersome due to multiple steps, the major impediment in setting up this assay is the skill that is required to generate the antigen used. Generation of JE-infected mouse brain homogenates necessitates the maintenance of large colonies of suckling mice from where the JE-infected brains are sourced. The preparation of this antigen not only involves animal sacrifice, but also a laborious procedure of inactivating the infectious virus followed by acetone extraction of the brain tissue. This process is also unduly risky since it exposes the individuals involved in antigen preparation to very high titers of extremely pathogenic virus. Moreover, the antigen being a crude viral preparation, quite often elicits non-specific reactions from human sera (13). The non-availability of skilled personnel and the high attendant costs of antigen preparation have resulted in very few hospitals having the expertise to set up this assay in India, a country endemic for JEV. As a result, samples from suspected JE patients are stored for extended periods of time in hospitals that admit JE cases and sent to the testing units only on collection of a sufficiently large number of samples. More often than not, the results are procured after the patient has been treated, based on the symptoms exhibited, and discharged from the hospital on recovery. Hence, the availability of easily produced, cost-effective, purified recombinant antigen devoid of contaminating host proteins would be an immense advancement in the sero-diagnosis of JEV. Furthermore, in cases where the detection of anti-JE antibodies in the test sample is the prime objective without the necessity for antibody-subtype determination, a 3 step direct ELISA (Fig. 4B) with the recombinant antigen should be easily able to replace the existing 5-step format.

Summary
We studied the reactivity of sera obtained from Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV)- exposed individuals living in a JE-endemic area of South India to the glycosylated proteins envelope and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) of the virus. Reactivity to the envelope protein was present in all categories including patients and healthy contacts. Envelope-specific reactivity was preferentially observed to the native folded form of the protein with a small minority of serum samples showing exclusive reactivity to the denatured protein. About half the convalescent patients tested also had reactivity to the NS1 protein and healthy contacts in general did not show antibodies in serum to the NS1 protein. Our results suggest the use of a combination of denatured and native recombinant envelope protein for successful diagnosis of JE infections.

Acknowledgements
PK was a recipient of a senior research fellowship from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. This work was supported by a grant (SP/SO/B-26/94) from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.

Dedication
This manuscript is dedicated to the memory of Dr. S. Ramachandran. His own work on the serology of several animal viruses and his keen insight and enthusiasm for developing newer approaches to the study of emerging pathogens has been a source of inspiration to younger scientists. He always showed a keen interest in our studies on Japanese encephalitis and was always generous with advice. It is an honour for us to be able to contribute this article to his Festschrift.

References

  1. Igarashi, A. (1992). Wld. Hlth. Statist. Q., 45: 299.
  2. Bu’Lock, F.A. (1986). Quar. J. Med., 60: 825.
  3. Chambers, T.J. et al. (1990). A. Rev. Microbiol., 44: 649.
  4. Smithburn, K.L. et al. (1954). J. Immunol., 72: 248.
  5. Rodrigues, F.M. (1984). Epidemiology of Japanese encephalitis in India. A brief overview. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Japanese Encephalitis-1982. p. 1. Ed. K. Satyanarayana. Indian Council of Medical Research. New Delhi.
  6. Gajanana, A. et al. (1995). Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org., 73: 237.
  7. Burke, D.S. and A. Nisalak. (1982). J. Clin. Microbiol., 15: 353.
  8. Burke, D.S. et al. (1985a). Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 34: 1203.
  9. Ravi, V.S. et al. (1989). J. Med. Virol., 29: 221.
  10. Burke, D.S. et al. (1985b). J. Infect. Dis., 151: 1093.
  11. Webb, J.K.G. et al. (1964). Japanese B encephalitis in South India: isolation of virus from human brain. In Asian Paediatrics. Eds. S. K. Bose and A. K. Dey. Asia publishing House, Bombay.
  12. McAda, P. C. et al. (1987). Virology, 158: 348.
  13. Konishi, E. et al. (1995). Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 53: 278.

Authors Corresponding address: 

Dr. Priti Kumar
Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560 012, India

Prof. S. Vijaya
Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560 012, India 


The views expressed in this article are of the author(s), and any clarifications can be obtained from the author(s).