<%@ Language=VBScript %> IVC - Featured Article <% Set Con=Server.CreateObject("Adodb.Connection") Con.Open("DSN=scroll connect") mySQL = "SELECT * FROM scroll" Set RS=Con.Execute(mySQL) %>

INPUTS FOR SUSTAINABLE ANIMAL RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Part - IV : ENERGY

Prof (Dr.) Rama Kumar, V
Ex-Secretary, Veterinary council of India


PREAMBLE: When I sat down to write this part, (part-IV) the idea was to discuss the energy inputs that may be required for animal husbandry or animal production. That is to say the various types of energy inputs that are required for animal rearing as well as product handling and the energy output that can come from animal resources i.e. a balance sheet of energy used and returned by animals of India. But it appears that the data on the energy required for feed production, harvesting, transport, storage, mixing, feeding, watering, housing, waste management, product collection, its storage, processing, storage, distribution etc. are conspicuous by their absence. Extrapolating the data available elsewhere is also not possible because such data is limited to the metabolic energy requirement of various animals with no reference to the environment. . So, energy needed is discussed more on assumptions and perceptions. However, some data on energy /power used for agriculture etc. is traceable and is discussed. All said and done, I intend to trigger off a thought process on the urgency for evaluating the energy needs for AH through this feature.

Bio-Data

1. ENERGY/ POWER
Sun is a storehouse of energy. Only earth and other solar planets intercept a small fraction of this energy. The exact value of the solar constant (the solar energy) is not known but is believed to be between 1,353 and 1,395 W/m2 [www.osti.gov/phv/phvhome.html - 5k]. But there is acute shortage of power for humanity on the surface of earth. Possibly, there is a mismatch of availability and need of energy, in respect of time, quantity and quality. As you study energy closely one gets a feeling that harnessing and management would be more important than its generation. The two basic problems facing India's development are power and population. If population can be a source of power, (i.e. the man power) a good part of India's energy requirement could be met. Gandhiji, the father of the nation suggested production by masses with the same objective. Animal power was once extensively used for a variety of activities in India. Historians feel that slavery was never formed part of life style or culture of Indian sub-continent (Indus valley civilization), possibly due to such extensive use of animals for work. 

2. SOURCES OF ENERGY: Energy can be sourced indirectly from wind, sea wave sun light, wastes, alcohol, fossil fuel etc. They are just being mentioned with sources. Only issues of power related to animals or animal rearing is being discussed currently. 

BIO-WASTE: Australia, has started to burns the residual fibre waste from raw sugar processing - called bagasse - to produce steam, to work the machines which process the cane and drive electricity generators. The present installed capacity of all the sugar mills in Australia is about 250 megawatts, 60-70 megawatts of which is sold to the electricity grid. This is only a fraction of the potential capacity. The installed electricity generation capacity of sewage farms around Australia is about 7.5 megawatts electricity production from this source could triple by 2010.  www.science.org.au/nova/039/039key.htm - 12k - 21 Oct 2003

WIND MILL: The first windmills were developed to automate grain grinding and water-pumping (in Persia and in China around 500-900 A.D. The bulk-power, utility-scale wind energy conversion systems were first undertaken in Russia in 1931. The wind farm market was soon be dominated by the Danes. telosnet.com/wind/ - 10k

SEA WAVES: Efforts to harness sea waves are under way in Canada, Europe and Japan. As of 1995, 685 kilowatts of grid-connected wave generating capacity was operating worldwide. This capacity comes from eight demonstration plants, it says. sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2002/02/25/daily80.html


RV co's power stations will use a device called the Rochester Venturi, a cross between a wing and a funnel, which is placed underwater and channels tidal flows. Unlike other wave and tidal devices it does not have any moving parts immersed in the sea. Because it is below the surface, it is not subject to storms. www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,475481,00.html - 37k


ALCHOHOL: Is mainly a by-product of sugar industry and often considered a potent source of power. In the early 1900's, several companies made fans that worked on the Sterling Engine principle. Also called a hot air engine, it worked using a source of heat such as a kerosene or alcohol lamp, which heated the air in a piston. This piston turned a crankshaft to which the fan blade was attached. Convenient where electricity was not available, these fans are still used today. www.fancollectors.org/info/defbody.htm - 27k. It may be beneficial to add something to the fuel for the purpose of lubricating the valves. Unfortunately, diesel and most petroleum-based oils will not mix with wet ethanol.

SOLAR POWER: Is almost in final stages of use and is marketed as cooker, water heater, light and what not?
Now you can power up, for example, a room in your house or cabin, for $500 or less--this includes lights, TV, computer, maybe even a small refrigerator. You need just a little handy using basic tools and virtually no maintenance. With a small solar electric systems in place--the power is considered to be more dependable than the grid.

THE FOSSIL FUEL: The oil reserves of the world are fast getting depleted; many sources are expected to last for another two decades only. Our Assam source has started showing signs of decline. Some developed countries are currently importing crude, keeping their own oil wells untapped for the future. OPA (oil pool account) is unpredictable as it depends on domestic requirement to keep pace with urbanization, technology development, transport, communication etc. as well as OPEC price line. 90% of our current need of energy for cooking in rural areas is met from dung cakes and crop residues. 


Domestic production of crude oil has declined from 63% in 1989-90 to a projected 32% of the projected requirement in 1999-2000. Agriculture is currently demanding 40% (39.52%) of its energy requirements by way of oil driven sources. The proposed national agriculture policy is expected to push up the oil demand manifolds. Unless other sources of energy like, alcohol, solar, dung gas, wind etc. are explored on a war footing, agriculture may find itself in grave crisis. Procurement price of food grains has already shot up and any further rise in OPA is likely to further it. Last year we imported 68 Million Tons (MT) of crude oil and 10 MT of petroleum products. For 2000-01 import of petroleum product will be reduced; but crude import will rise proportionately. Roughly for every rise of $1 crude price the import will rise by $40 million and the rise of $10 would shoot our liability by $4 Billion. 

[Based on: "From the bottom of the pool" by S.C. Das in Swagat, Nov 2000, issue. Page 76]


3. POWER GENERATION AND USE IN INDIA 
The current perspective India had an installed capacity of 2000 MW of electric power in 1950 (i.e. before five year plans of development were launched). Today we generate 85,000 MW electricity and nearly one third of it (30.54%) is used for agriculture specially for hi-tech cropping where the large landholders are involved. In some states it is given free of cost.


TRACTORS: With introduction of hi-tech agriculture number of tractors increased considerably (from 5000 in 1950 to 3 lakh tractors as on date). But many tractors are under-utilised and number of small farmers had been tempted to buy tractor on loans and had fallen to debts.


FUEL: We import petroleum products worth more than Rs. 30 to 35 thousand crores every year. A good share is used for agriculture. An increased OPA (oil pool account*) each year will add to oil pool deficit Rs. 12,000 crores if world price does not soften. 

Contributions of various energy sources for agriculture#
Following green revolution, machine power has a major role, so has the dependence on oil. Since oil is a major source of energy for hi-tech agriculture it must be considered from fiscal angle also. The table below shows the contribution of various energy sources used in India for agriculture. 200 million men and 84 million draught animals provide substantial energy for agriculture. 

 

TABLE 1

# SOURCE: Tata energy Research Institute (TERI), 1995. Environmental considerations and options in managing India's long-term energy strategy (ECOMILES) p.59. TERI Energy Data Directory Yearbook, 1998. p.241. 


4. USE OF ENERGY FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRY/ PRODUCTION 
Though the energy requirement for various activities connected to animal production could not be traced, energy needs of various live-stock/ domestic animals in production are known. Grains are considered a major source of energy for animal in the west while Indian livestock do produce with minimal or no grain in their feed. Possibly the studies on the basal or energy metabolism of various breeds of domestic animals of India brought up on common property resources and crop residues need more study. Energy inputs for the production of fish or meat of cold-blooded animals is considerably lower than that of mammals or avian species. Similarly, it is known that at least in buffaloes, which contribute more than 56% share to milk production of India, the major source of energy is not glucose, but volatile fatty acids (VFA). It is also seen that the energy/ power input required for various animal husbandry activities in India is essentially in the form of man power (woman power to be more precise). When we consider the balance sheet of energy/ power in the Indian context, the facts just mentioned may have to taken into account.

5. ANIMAL AS SOURCE OF POWER (Animal Power) AND ENERGY
Even though the energy contribution from Draught Animal Power (DAP) which was around 70% has shrunken to 25%, it is estimated that more than 55% of the land is cultivated by DAP with 2 ha (hectare) command area per pair of bullocks. Paddy which was grown in 23.5% of the total area (in 1987) uses 35.6% of total DAP energy. Use of animal energy per hectare for jute, potato, onion and paddy crops is comparatively high. These crops are grown in states having higher DAP density and lower mechanical power

Draught Animal Power (DAP) is the muscle power of Draught Animals (DA's). 74 million (m). bullocks and 8 m. he-buffaloes make available 40 m. Hp, and energy worth Rs.10,000 crores per year. DA's plough 100 m. hectares of area sown (66%), and haul 25 billion-ton kilometers of freight in 15 m. Animal Drawn Carts (ADCs). DAP annually saves six m. tons of petroleum, worth >Rs. 12,000 crores, mostly in foreign exchange. Asset value of DAP system is >Rs.25,000 crores. 

 

TABLE - 2*

Asset value of animals and adjunct equipments

Rs. 25,000 crores

Energy available per year 

5000 crores units

Area cultivated 

100 mha

Freight moved per year 

25 B. tonne kms

Petroleum saved per year

6 m tonnes, valued at Rs.12,000 crores per year (this changes with cost of fuel)

*Ramaswamy, Director, CARTMAN, 870, 17E Main, Koramangala VI Block, Bangalore-560 095.
E-mail: cartman@vsnl.com 

 

In India, there must be about 100 million working animals including draught animals (DA's), pack animals, shepherding & security animals. Species, size and breeds of animals used for work vary with regions. Use of Draught Animal Power (DAP) for agricultural operations steeply declined during green revolution when machine power was adopted for hi-tech crop production. Highways are being increasingly used by heavy, high-speed vehicles that replace animal driven carts. 

 

But, for small-scale agriculture and transportation of goods in many small townships, semi-urban and rural areas, DAP is still a readily available source of energy and technology, within the means of farmers. 

 
The development of animal power (AP) depends on the number of animals available, their access and acceptability to the community, size, endurance, health status, selection, breeding efficiency etc. Issues involved in the use of DAP or AP are many. The number of bullocks has considerably been reduced. With labor demand in agriculture limited to 90-100 days, animal had tilling job for the limited period only. It becomes difficult for farmers to maintain male animals for the rest of the 265 days and feed them. DAP is chiefly used for ploughing, lift irrigation, and cane crushing. Mechanical efficiency as well as safety of many of the implements has scope for improvement and for optimal use of animal power. Issues could be addressed and use of innovated products optimized, if research and development are conducted under field conditions and involving the end users. 


6. ENERGY FOR COOKING: Rural India frequently uses dried cow dung (cow dung cakes) for cooking. This (biomass) is a major source of energy for cooking. In rural India, Indian cattle and buffaloes produce (by a modest estimate) more than 800 MT (million tons) of fiber rich dung every year. Of this around 300 MT is burned as dung cakes for cooking energy and the rest is used as manure. Nearly 90% of cooking energy of India's rural areas is from crop residues and cow dung cake (78%+11.5%). Manure gas plant especially the cow dung gas plants though low in water consumption, has not caught up due to operational problems. (Human waste can be added) These difficulties vary from region to region and season to season.

 

TABLE 3

Energy source for cooking: Percentage distribution of household

Energy source 

Rural 

Urban

No cooking 

.7 

6.3

Coke coal

1.4 

5.7

Fire wood /crop residue 

78.2

29.9

L.P. Gas 

1.9

29.6

Gobar gas 

0.3

0.1

Dung cake

11.5

2.4

Charcoal

0.0

0.2

Kerosene

2.0

23.2

Others

3.8

2.6

Derived from: National Sample Survey 50th Round: July, 1993 to June 1994 


7. ANIMAL DRIVEN GENERATOR
10th plan sub-committee on Draught animal power has considered among other things the proposal for an animal driven generator, especially for un-connected remote areas. From time immemorial India had been using animal power for various activities of life. Though majority of the breeds of cattle of India are draught or duel purpose animals (see table 6), DA's remain idle in their barn for most part of the year. Currently in India less than 30% of the Potential Animal Power (PAP) is in use. Since farmers are unable to earn during lean season, they are kept on meager subsistence ration and low exercise. This can lead to diseases of musculo-skeletal system that may cripple them at early productive age. Methods for fully tapping potential animal power (PAP) and using it optimally throughout the year can be part of a total animal energy management plan. All energy problems stem from the methods of trapping energy streams for development. The animal driven mini-generator works on a bullock driven dynamo and with alternators and energy storage devices. This device can find work for animals all through the year. The models proposed could be fabricated and maintained by local blacksmiths and mechanics. By way of using material available locally (preferably through a participatory research), micro-generators may be useful in far-flung areas that are denied development for want of power-based communication. The high cost & transmission losses often stand in the way of accessing power to remote areas where population density is low. Tables below compare expenditure of production and transmission of electricity and of DA's in India. 

TABLE 4

APPROX. COST OF PRODUCTION/ ESTABLISHMENT OF VARIOUS POWER GENERATIONS 

METHOD

COST OF ESTABLISHMENT

Running Cost

REMARKS

THERMAL

Rs. 4 crores / M.watt 

High 

need air/ oil; water for cooling, wear & tear more, pollution, soot & fly ash

NUCLEAR 

Rs. 6 crores/ M.Watt 

Low 

high safety required; input of N. material needed

HYDEL

Rs. 3-8* crores/ M.Watt 

Low 

depend on rain/ snow; loss of flora and fauna in catchments, seismic threat,

GAS TURBINE Combined cycle

Rs. 2.5-3.4 crores/ M.Watt 

Low 

need regular gas supply; pollution and heat generation

MINI-HYDEL 

Rs. 2 crores/ M.Watt 

Low 

area specific

 

TABLE 5

APPROXIMATE COST OF LAYING OF TRANSMISSION LINES

KILO VOLTAGE TRANSMITTED 

COST OF TRANSMISSION / Km (Single circuit) 

COST OF TRANSMISSION / Km (Double circuit)

REMARKS

66 K.V 

Rs. 5 lakh/ Km

Rs. 8 lakh/ Km 

Transmits@ 20/ MVA

220 KV 

Rs. 10 lakh/ Km 

Rs.18 lakh/ Km 

Carry 150 MVA to 300 

 

TABLE 6

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES - A COMPARISON OF VARIOUS METHODS

Large Power Generation Units 

Animal Driven Micro Units

Remarks

High initial investment

Low initial investment

 

Long incubation period

Can be fabricated quickly

 

High risk factor

Risk of disease/ injury and fatigue in animals*

*can be reduced by proper management

Transmission loss high 

Transmission loss minimal

 

Transmission cost high

Transmission cost low

 

Continuous availability

Can't operate for more than 4 hours, needs rest 

 

Can be distributed to a vast area

Limited to home & one unit use

 

High maintenance cost & risk factor

Comparatively low

 

Maintenance repair & Supervisory cost high

Can be maintained locally by local artisans and blacksmiths

 

Suitable for industry, public utility etc.

Suitable only for local use within a unit

 

Pollution, thermal emission, radiation possible 

Minimum pollution, low emission 

 

Loss and devastation high during disaster, chances of blast are high

Loss is limited and devastation minimum 

 

 

TABLE 7

ADULT MALES USED AS PER 1992 LIVESTOCK CENSUS (IN THOUSANDS)

Figures in parenthesis indicate percentage

 

Total Adult

Used for breeding Only

Used for work only

Used for breeding and work

Total breeding (2) + (4) 

Total work (3) + (4)

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

Crossbred Cattle

4667 

177 (3.79)

2100(45)

256(5.49)

433(9.28)

2356(50.48)

Indigenous Cattle

96907

10046(10.37)

52885(54.57)

7990(8.25)

18036(18.61)

60875(62.81)

Total Cattle

101574 

10223(10.06)

54985(54.13)

8246(8.12)

18469(18.18)

63231(62.25)

Buffalo

17361

518(2.98)

5011(28.86) 

2346(13.51)

2864(16.50)

7357(42.38)

Grand Total

118935

10741(9.03)

59996(50.44)

10592(8.91) 

21333(17.94)

70588(59.35)

Courtesy Dr. Batobyal. A., Joint Commissioner, Dept. Animal husbandry and Dairying, Govt. of India. 
Working group on animal husbandry and dairying for 10th plan

 

TABLE 8

INDIAN BREEDS OF CATTLE & BUFFALOE USED FOR DRAUGHT 
Source: Dr. S. Krishnamurthy, SDC, New Delhi, 1994

Sl No

Breed

Breed Tract

Type

CATTLE

1.

Nagori 

Rajasthan 

Draught

2.

Bachaur

Bihar

Draught

3.

Kenkatha 

Uttar Pradesh

Draught

4.

Malvi

Madhya Pradesh

Draught

5.

Kherigarh

Uttar Pradesh

Draught

6.

Hallikar

Karnataka 

Draught

7.

Aritmahal

Karnataka

Draught

8.

Khillari

Maharashtra

Draught

9.

Bargaur

Tamil Nadu

Draught

10. 

Kangayam

Tamil Nadu 

Draught

11.

Ponwar

Uttar Pradesh

Draught

12.

Siri 

West Bengal & Sikkim

General Utility

13.

Nimari

Madhya Pradesh 

General Utility

14.

Dangi

Maharashtra 

General Utility

15. 

Hariana

Haryana, Punjab, U.P. & Rajasthan 

General Utility

16.

Mewati 

Rajasthan 

General Utility

17.

Rath 

Rajasthan 

General Utility

18.

Ongole

Andhra Pradesh

General Utility

19. 

Gaolao

Madhya Pradesh & Maharashtra 

General Utility

20.

Krishna Valley 

Andhra Pr, Karnataka & Maharashtra

General Utility

21.

Tharparkar 

Gujarat & Rajasthan 

General Utility

22.

Kankrej 

Gujarat 

General Utility

BUFFALO (Uncastrated males of these species are used for draught) 

23.

Murrah 

Haryana, Uttar Pradesh & Rajasthan 

Milch

24.

Nili-Ravi

Punjab 

Milch

25.

Jaffrabadi

Gujarat

Milch

26. 

Surti 

Gujarat 

Milch

27.

Mehsani

Gujarat 

Milch

28.

Bhadhavari

Uttar Pradesh 

Milch

29.

Tarai

Uttar Pradesh

Milch

30.

Nagpuri or Ellichpuri

Maharashtra

Milch

31.

Pandharpuri 

Maharashtra 

Milch

32.

Manda 

Madhya Pradesh 

Milch

33.

Jerangi

Hills of Orissa

Milch

34.

Kalahandi or Parlakhemunid

Orissa 

Milch

35

Sambhalpuri 

Orissa 

Milch

36.

Toda

Udakamandalan Hills, Tamil Nadu

Milch

37.

South Kanara

Karnataka 

Milch

 

CONCLUSION
India has already committed itself to hi-tech agriculture and has achieved a grain revolution in terms of production. But all the same it had to pay a price in respect of high energy use, Oil Pool deficit etc. We must assess whether we have factually gained in terms of fiscal balance, factor productivity, food security or sustainability, by attempting to adopt global technologies and trends of production. Before we venture on hi-tech animal production we have to take a good look at the energy needs and prepare an affordable energy balance sheet. Optimal use of animal energy may a critical control point.

[ The next part would cover finance as an input need - Pl see Jan 2004 updates ]


Authors Corresponding address: 

Prof (Dr.) Rama Kumar, V
Ex-Secretary, Veterinary council of India.  
Email: ramkumarjaya@rediffmail.com   


The views expressed in this article are of the author(s), and any clarifications can be obtained from the author(s).